于 2013-3-11 22:41, John Ferlan 写道: > > Since I don't have the email to reply-to, here is a link: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2012-December/msg00026.html > > > Why was the decision to reuse the lifecycle_mutex rather than generating > a data specific mutex? Seems like that mutex is used for other > operations to protect filters and indications. Thus unless the two are > somehow tied, I really think it'd be better to create/use a data > specific mutex. > > Furthermore, there's a few mutex adds around thread mgmt that probably > should be a separate patch. That is - the non "dom_list" protection > additions appear to be different. > > John > It is just the quickest way to fix bug, it should be a separate lock just as mentioned in the commit message for performance, you can form a patch to fix it above or replace this patch. > _______________________________________________ > Libvirt-cim mailing list > Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim >