Remove enumerate() function in device.py and update tc to call new function in enumclass.py
Hi, Do you think it's better to remove enumerate() function in device.py? Then we have to update tc to call new EnumInstances() function in enumclass.py. Who would like to take up this work? If not, I will cook up these patches. Thanks! Best, Regards Daisy (运国莲) VSM Team, China Systems & Technology Labs (CSTL) E-mail: yunguol@cn.ibm.com TEL: (86)-21-60922403 Building 10, 399 Ke Yuan Rd, Pudong Shanghai, 201203
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
Hi,
Do you think it's better to remove enumerate() function in device.py? Then we have to update tc to call new EnumInstances() function in enumclass.py. Who would like to take up this work? If not, I will cook up these patches.
Yes it would be better to have a single Enumerate function in one library file. I think we will have lot of tc updates if we take this up. Kaitlin, What do you suggest? Regards, Deepti.
Thanks!
Best, Regards
Daisy (运国莲) VSM Team, China Systems & Technology Labs (CSTL) E-mail: yunguol@cn.ibm.com TEL: (86)-21-60922403 Building 10, 399 Ke Yuan Rd, Pudong Shanghai, 201203 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
Hi,
Do you think it's better to remove enumerate() function in device.py? Then we have to update tc to call new EnumInstances() function in enumclass.py. Who would like to take up this work? If not, I will cook up these patches.
Yes it would be better to have a single Enumerate function in one library file. I think we will have lot of tc updates if we take this up.
Kaitlin, What do you suggest?
Yes, I agree. The enumerate() functions in device.py are no longer needed. The functions in enumclass.py should cover this. Daisy - can you work up a patch for this? Thanks! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-10-13 23:39:50:
Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
Hi,
Do you think it's better to remove enumerate() function in device.py?
Then we have to update tc to call new EnumInstances() function in enumclass.py. Who would like to take up this work? If not, I will cook up these patches.
Yes it would be better to have a single Enumerate function in one library file. I think we will have lot of tc updates if we take this up.
Kaitlin, What do you suggest?
Yes, I agree. The enumerate() functions in device.py are no longer needed. The functions in enumclass.py should cover this.
Daisy - can you work up a patch for this?
I can work up it later. I'm now working on tc to call new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() functions. Due to a number of tc fails with sblim base provider installed, I have to fix them together with new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() calling. Whatever, I will try to work on it as soon as possible. Deepti - Would you please run the cimtest for Xen with sblim base provider installed and update the sblim-tc-base-failure in the wiki? Thanks!
Thanks!
-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-10-13 23:39:50:
Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
Hi,
Do you think it's better to remove enumerate() function in
device.py?
Then we have to update tc to call new EnumInstances() function in enumclass.py. Who would like to take up this work? If not, I will cook up these patches.
Yes it would be better to have a single Enumerate function in one library file. I think we will have lot of tc updates if we take this up.
Kaitlin, What do you suggest?
Yes, I agree. The enumerate() functions in device.py are no longer needed. The functions in enumclass.py should cover this.
Daisy - can you work up a patch for this?
I can work up it later. I'm now working on tc to call new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() functions. Due to a number of tc fails with sblim base provider installed, I have to fix them together with new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() calling. Whatever, I will try to work on it as soon as possible.
Deepti - Would you please run the cimtest for Xen with sblim base provider installed and update the sblim-tc-base-failure in the wiki?
Thanks!
I have verified the info on the wiki for sblim-base-providers yest and those are the current failures we need to fix. Thanks and Regards, Deepti.
Thanks!
-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-10-14 20:10:37:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 2008-10-13 23:39:50:
Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
Hi,
Do you think it's better to remove enumerate() function in
device.py?
Then we have to update tc to call new EnumInstances() function in enumclass.py. Who would like to take up this work? If not, I will cook up these patches.
Yes it would be better to have a single Enumerate function in one library file. I think we will have lot of tc updates if we take this up.
Kaitlin, What do you suggest?
Yes, I agree. The enumerate() functions in device.py are no longer needed. The functions in enumclass.py should cover this.
Daisy - can you work up a patch for this?
I can work up it later. I'm now working on tc to call new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() functions. Due to a number of tc fails with sblim base provider installed, I have to fix them together with new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() calling. Whatever, I will try to work on it as soon as possible.
Deepti - Would you please run the cimtest for Xen with sblim base provider installed and update the sblim-tc-base-failure in the wiki?
Thanks!
I have verified the info on the wiki for sblim-base-providers yest and those are the current failures we need to fix.
Excellent -- Deepti.
Thanks and Regards, Deepti.
Thanks!
-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Daisy - can you work up a patch for this?
I can work up it later. I'm now working on tc to call new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() functions. Due to a number of tc fails with sblim base provider installed, I have to fix them together with new EnumInstances() and GetInstance() calling. Whatever, I will try to work on it as soon as possible.
Deepti - Would you please run the cimtest for Xen with sblim base provider installed and update the sblim-tc-base-failure in the wiki?
Sure - this is fine. Thanks! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
participants (3)
-
Deepti B Kalakeri -
Guo Lian Yun -
Kaitlin Rupert