2:23 p.m.
# HG changeset patch
# User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
# Date 1220941374 25200
# Node ID 25c48331735e8975a715ba3464d38e9f21f9be12
# Parent 8abcd820b6b37e5fbe8ccc30734cefa908dfab78
[TEST] Add 10 seconds delay at the beginning of LogicalDisk-02_nodevs.py for Xen/XenFV
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
diff -r 8abcd820b6b3 -r 25c48331735e suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py
--- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py Fri Sep 05 02:47:24 2008 -0700
+++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py Mon Sep 08 23:22:54 2008 -0700
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
import sys
import pywbem
+from time import sleep
from VirtLib import live
from XenKvmLib import devices
from CimTest.Globals import logger, CIM_ERROR_ENUMERATE
@@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ def main():
if not clean_system(options.ip, options.virt):
logger.error("System has defined domains; unable to run")
return SKIP
-
+ if options.virt == 'Xen' or options.virt == 'XenFV':
+ sleep(10)
key_list = ["DeviceID", "CreationClassName",
"SystemName",
"SystemCreationClassName"]
11:44 p.m.
diff -r 8abcd820b6b3 -r 25c48331735e
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py
--- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py Fri Sep 05 02:47:24 2008 -0700
+++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py Mon Sep 08 23:22:54 2008 -0700
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
import sys
import pywbem
+from time import sleep
from VirtLib import live
from XenKvmLib import devices
from CimTest.Globals import logger, CIM_ERROR_ENUMERATE
@@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ def main():
if not clean_system(options.ip, options.virt):
logger.error("System has defined domains; unable to run")
return SKIP
-
+ if options.virt == 'Xen' or options.virt == 'XenFV':
+ sleep(10)
key_list = ["DeviceID", "CreationClassName",
"SystemName",
"SystemCreationClassName"]
I gave them some more thought.. adding an arbitrary sleep in a test
isn't really a good idea - because systems run at varying speeds, so you
can't guarantee how long you'll need to sleep.
A better approach would be to poll to see if there are no guests... if
there are no guests defined, then run the test, otherwise keep polling.
You could poll for 10 seconds or so. So something like:
timer_count = 10
if count < timer_count:
#Get list of defined/active guests on the system
#If no guests are defined
break
sleep(1)
Does this sound reasonable?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
3:39 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] [TEST] Add 10 seconds delay at the beginning of LogicalDisk-02_nodevs.py for Xen/XenFV
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-09 23:44:15:
> diff -r 8abcd820b6b3 -r 25c48331735e suites/libvirt-
cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py
> --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py Fri
Sep 05 02:47:24 2008 -0700
> +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/LogicalDisk/02_nodevs.py Mon
Sep 08 23:22:54 2008 -0700
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>
> import sys
> import pywbem
> +from time import sleep
> from VirtLib import live
> from XenKvmLib import devices
> from CimTest.Globals import logger, CIM_ERROR_ENUMERATE
> @@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ def main():
> if not clean_system(options.ip, options.virt):
> logger.error("System has defined domains; unable to run")
> return SKIP
> -
> + if options.virt == 'Xen' or options.virt == 'XenFV':
> + sleep(10)
> key_list = ["DeviceID", "CreationClassName",
"SystemName",
> "SystemCreationClassName"]
I gave them some more thought.. adding an arbitrary sleep in a test
isn't really a good idea - because systems run at varying speeds, so you
can't guarantee how long you'll need to sleep.
A better approach would be to poll to see if there are no guests... if
there are no guests defined, then run the test, otherwise keep polling.
You could poll for 10 seconds or so. So something like:
timer_count = 10
if count < timer_count:
#Get list of defined/active guests on the system
#If no guests are defined
break
sleep(1)
Does this sound reasonable?
Agree with you.
If there is still define guest on the system after waiting for
10 seconds, then shall we have to make the timer_count longer?
Thanks!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
4:46 a.m.
>
> I gave them some more thought.. adding an arbitrary sleep in a test
> isn't really a good idea - because systems run at varying speeds, so you
> can't guarantee how long you'll need to sleep.
>
> A better approach would be to poll to see if there are no guests... if
> there are no guests defined, then run the test, otherwise keep polling.
> You could poll for 10 seconds or so. So something like:
>
> timer_count = 10
>
> if count < timer_count:
> #Get list of defined/active guests on the system
> #If no guests are defined
> break
> sleep(1)
>
> Does this sound reasonable?
Agree with you.
If there is still define guest on the system after waiting for
10 seconds, then shall we have to make the timer_count longer?
The problem here is that it's possible the user has other defined guests
in the system. So we can't keep polling for there to be no guests. The
best we can do is poll for a given amount of time. If the system still
has guests on it after the timer is up, then we need to skip the test.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
11:11 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] [TEST] Add 10 seconds delay at the beginning of LogicalDisk-02_nodevs.py for Xen/XenFV
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-09-11 04:46:16:
> >
> > I gave them some more thought.. adding an arbitrary sleep in a test
> > isn't really a good idea - because systems run at varying speeds,
so you
> > can't guarantee how long you'll need to sleep.
> >
> > A better approach would be to poll to see if there are no guests...
if
> > there are no guests defined, then run the test, otherwise
keep
polling.
> > You could poll for 10 seconds or so. So something
like:
> >
> > timer_count = 10
> >
> > if count < timer_count:
> > #Get list of defined/active guests on the system
> > #If no guests are defined
> > break
> > sleep(1)
> >
> > Does this sound reasonable?
>
> Agree with you.
> If there is still define guest on the system after waiting for
> 10 seconds, then shall we have to make the timer_count longer?
>
The problem here is that it's possible the user has other defined guests
in the system. So we can't keep polling for there to be no
guests. The
best we can do is poll for a given amount of time. If the system
still
has guests on it after the timer is up, then we need to skip the test.
Done. Patch on the way.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
5840
days inactive
5842
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Guo Lian Yun -
Kaitlin Rupert -
yunguol＠cn.ibm.com