class Virt_VirtualSystemMigrationCapabilities
Hi Dan, the subclass for VirtualSystemMigrationCapabilities in VSMigrationCapabilities.mof has "Virt" as prefix instead of "CIM". Does this has a certain background ? ... class Virt_VirtualSystemMigrationCapabilities : CIM_Capabilities { ... -- Regards Heidi Eckhart Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - Open Hypervisor heidieck@linux.vnet.ibm.com ************************************************** IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter Geschaeftsfuehrung: Herbert Kircher Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
HE> the subclass for VirtualSystemMigrationCapabilities in HE> VSMigrationCapabilities.mof has "Virt" as prefix instead of HE> "CIM". Does this has a certain background ? I think that I was running into an issue putting the superclass in the MOF when I did that. I was seeing some weird behavior, and thought it might have been related to putting a CIM_ class in the implementation MOF. I'm sure it was unrelated, but I didn't change it back. If it works as CIM_, I'm fine with switching it. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com
Dan Smith wrote:
HE> the subclass for VirtualSystemMigrationCapabilities in HE> VSMigrationCapabilities.mof has "Virt" as prefix instead of HE> "CIM". Does this has a certain background ?
I think that I was running into an issue putting the superclass in the MOF when I did that. I was seeing some weird behavior, and thought it might have been related to putting a CIM_ class in the implementation MOF. I'm sure it was unrelated, but I didn't change it back.
If it works as CIM_, I'm fine with switching it.
I would not expect problems by changing the prefix to CIM_, buf if there are, please send me the message and I can have a look into it. The same seemed to happen in VSMigrationService.mof - there is a class called Virt_MigrationJob. But I'm not sure if this one should get the CIM or Xen/KVM prefix. What does the implementor say ;) ? -- Regards Heidi Eckhart Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center - Open Hypervisor
HE> The same seemed to happen in VSMigrationService.mof - there is a HE> class called Virt_MigrationJob. But I'm not sure if this one HE> should get the CIM or Xen/KVM prefix. What does the implementor HE> say ;) ? For the other classes, I made Virt_ versions of their defined classes because I thought Pegasus was giving me trouble. However, I don't think there is a CIM_MigrationJob in the Migration profile, so I would tend to thing that keeping it as Virt_MigrationJob:CIM_ConcreteJob would be the right thing to do. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms@us.ibm.com
participants (2)
-
Dan Smith -
Heidi Eckhart