1 Oct
2008
1 Oct
'08
10:01 p.m.
What we really want to do here is implement cim_start(). You're welcome to leave this as is, but eventually we'll need to replace this (and the cxml.start() calls) with a cim_start() call.
This will be more uniform than using cim_define() to define a guest and then using a non-vxml related function to change the guest's state. But cim_start() (or cim_state_change(), whichever way you think is best) can be added at some later time.
I will modify these to use the cim_start in the next iterations, as I would like to spend time in completing to support the tc to work with the SBLIM changes.
Yep, that's fine by me. =) -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com