Re: [Libvirt-cim] KVM on Pegasus Test Run Summary for Dec 15 2008

>> FAIL Test Summary: >> VirtualSystemManagementService - 14_define_sys_disk.py: FAIL > The above tc is failing because of the the missing VirtualDevice > field in the DiskRASD passed to DefineSystem(). > The net, disk, proc, mem RASD properties passed to the DefineSystem() > in this tc are obtained by the association of AC with > SettingsDefineCapabilities. > With the F9 rpm the VirtualDevice field in the DiskRASD is not set > and hence the DefineSystem() throws an error. > The tc passes when we include rasd['VirtualDevice'] field to contain > appropriate VirtualDevice value 'hda' in case [KVM] of F9 rpm. > > I have a doubt here, the changes to throw an error on Missing > VirtualDevice field was included in the modifications made to the > patch with revision 681 > "Remove the default implied VirtualDevice on DiskRASD", but the > changes included in the F9 rpm are upto 613. > Can you let me know upto which changeset does the F9 rpm cover? This is because the F9 rpm has additional patches applied to it. The last rpm update we did, we added the DiskRASD patch (along with a few others). You can tell patches have been applied, because the revision number is 613+ instead of 613. This makes branching the test difficult because you cannot rely on the revision number alone. What you can do is check the changeset value. In const.py, you can designate the change set as the F9 changeset. This will allow you to branch tests appropriately.

>> VirtualSystemManagementService - 15_mod_system_settings.py: FAIL > The tc fails only with the KVM F9 rpm. > The value of AutomaticRecoveryAction is set to 2 only for KVM with F9 > rpm, otherwise the value is 3 for Xen and KVM with current sources. > I am not able to track if this was expected behavior of setting > AutomaticRecoveryAction to 2 when the F9 rpm was built and was > changed later to be set to 3 for the modifications beyond revision 613. > Can you help ? Looks like this is being caused by a bug in the F9 libvirt rpm. Do the following to reproduce this issue just using virsh: 1) Run the test, dump the guest xml. 2) Modify the guest xml so that <on_crash> is set to restart. 3) Define the guest using the xml. 4) Dump the xml of the newly defined guest. The value for <on_crash> will be destroy, not restart. I'd add a bug on the wiki page and have this test XFAIL on F9.