Zhengang Li wrote:
Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
> Dan Smith wrote:
>> KR> Nice - thanks Zhengang, I think this looks good. =)
>>
>> Indeed, but I don't think there's any reason to not put it into the
>> suite-specific library, right?
>>
>> Other suites (should they ever materialize) won't want this, of
>> course.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Good call - I overlooked this. We could come up place in the XenKvmLib
> library to store the CIM_REV / CIM_SET instead.
>
XenKvmLib.const?
Sounds good to me. =)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com