于 2013-8-19 11:31, Wenchao Xia 写道:
于 2013-8-15 22:48, Viktor Mihajlovski 写道:
For architectures like s390 the machine type is relevant for the proper guest construction. We add the necessary properties to the schema and the C structures and the necessary code for CIM-to-libvirt mapping.
While doing this I noticed that the union fields in os_info were set by means of XML parsing which doesn't take into account that certain fields are depending on the virtualization type. I think this is a issue. Could u split this patch into two: 1 consider virt type for os_info, bugfix. 2 add xml-domain-VSSD mapping for properties machine and arch.
Thus will make commit history clear and easier to review. reasonable enough, I will send out a split version once I get feedback for the other patches.
[...]
I haven't check DMTF docs, but wonder if there are existing DMTF file point out where this property should belong. If no, I think put it in VSSD is OK. It wouldn't logically fit into a RASD since it defines an intrinsic
On 08/19/2013 10:35 AM, Wenchao Xia wrote: property of the guest, not of an associated resource, so VSSD is the right place for the property. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards Viktor Mihajlovski IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294