
21 Nov
2007
21 Nov
'07
6:42 p.m.
Jay Gagnon wrote:
@@ -264,7 +265,7 @@ static CMPIStatus GetInstance(CMPIInstan goto out; }
- inst = get_rasd_instance(context, ref, id, type); + inst = get_rasd_instance(context, ref, _BROKER, id, type);
Think you got the wrong broker there. Should be broker, not _BROKER, right? Everything else looks fine. Assuming that _BROKER gets taken care of, it's +1 from me.
The way the patch was generated made this piece confusing. get_rasd_instance() is being called from the GetInstance() function in Virt_RASD.c. Anytime a provider calls get_rasd_instance(), it will need to pass it's own _BROKER. -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center karupert@us.ibm.com