Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 5] #2 EAFP and RAFP support invalid references.

Looks like a good set to me. The one patch is a little bit incongruous, but the total volume is quite manageable so it's not really an issue. Also, having a patch that may or may not fit into a set is far less of a concern to me than having changes that may or may not belong in a patch. Each individual patch is clear and consistent, so don't worry. Also, the (inst == NULL) check is a good catch. I wouldn't be surprised if we need that in a few more spots, especially since we've been a bit inconsistent when it comes to the "Is a NULL instance an error or just a NULL instance?" question. -- -Jay