Re: [Fwd: Re: [Libvirt-cim] Test Run Summary (Mar 09 2009): KVM on Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) with sfcb]

Just in case you missed it on the list.. These messages you're seeing are expected failures. The test case is trying to destroy a guest that no longer exists. So you would expect to

see errors in the provider debug, right?

-- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com ----- Message from Deepti B Kalakeri <deeptik(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt; on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:51:17 +0530 ----- To: List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM

Subject: Re: [Libvirt-cim] Test Run Summary (Mar 09 2009): KVM on Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) with sfcb Guo Lian Yun wrote: > > libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2009-03-09 10:45:59: > > > > > libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2009-03-09 09:45:08: > > > > > > > > > > > ================================================= > > > Test Run Summary (Mar 09 2009): KVM on Fedora release 10 > > (Cambridge)with sfcb > > > ================================================= > > > Distro: Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) > > > Kernel: 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.x86_64 > > > libvirt: 0.4.5 > > > Hypervisor: QEMU 0.9.1 > > > CIMOM: sfcb sfcbd 1.3.3preview > > > Libvirt-cim revision: 829 > > > Libvirt-cim changeset: 1aff0d0e9bf4 > > > Cimtest revision: 642 > > > Cimtest changeset: 087aaba26589 > > > ================================================= > > > FAIL : 4 > > > XFAIL : 3 > > > SKIP : 5 > > > PASS : 134 > > > ----------------- > > > Total : 146 > > > ================================================= > > > FAIL Test Summary: > > > ElementCapabilities - 03_forward_errs.py: FAIL > > I've sent a patch with fix. > > > > > ElementConforms - 01_forward.py: FAIL > > Same as above. > > > > > ElementConforms - 04_ectp_rev_errs.py: FAIL > > Same as above. > > > > > VirtualSystemManagementService - 05_destroysystem_neg.py: FAIL > > It seems this failure because that the provider has to free the > nonexistent domain in > invoking method DestroySystem. > > Here is the debugger error in sfcb: > libvir: Domain error : invalid domain pointer in virDomainFree > libvir: QEMU error : Domain not found > libvir: Domain error : invalid domain pointer in virDomainFree Daisy, The test case is written to verify the DestroySystem() returns an error when trying to remove non-existing domain and also when an invalid domain name is passed. The error statements returned seems to have changed. For ex: The err desc for DestroySystem() when non-existing domain is passed was previously CIM_ERR_FAILED:Unable to retrieve domain name is now changed to CIM_ERR_NOT_FOUND: Unable to retrieve domain name: Error 0 We need to change the way the error comparison is made. The comparison stmt like if err_desc.find(exp_value['desc']) >= 0: does not work, but if exp_value['desc'] in err_desc: works -- Thanks and Regards, Deepti B. Kalakeri IBM Linux Technology Center deeptik(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim