Guo Lian Yun wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
# Date 1209433604 25200
# Node ID 99ff1eb252d20b3954a1ad4e6788f1ca1341a800
# Parent 2b83c1992dfc44573ba0c00729e36311355807ad
[TEST] modified the revision number and resent the patch of VSSDC.03
Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
diff -r 2b83c1992dfc -r 99ff1eb252d2
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent/03_vssdc_fwd_errs.py
---
a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent/03_vssdc_fwd_errs.py Sun
Apr 27 19:22:03 2008 -0700
+++
b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent/03_vssdc_fwd_errs.py Mon
Apr 28 18:46:44 2008 -0700
@@ -62,12 +62,14 @@ from CimTest.ReturnCodes import PASS, FA
from CimTest.ReturnCodes import PASS, FAIL
from CimTest.Globals import do_main, logger
from CimTest.Globals import CIM_USER, CIM_PASS, CIM_NS
+from XenKvmLib.const import CIM_REV
sup_types = ['Xen', 'XenFV', 'KVM']
test_dom = "domu1"
test_mac = "00:11:22:33:44:aa"
test_vcpus = 1
+rev = 393
I think the actual change set is 417. While 393 works (it's the
changeset that tags the tree for the new release), it's misleading.
Thoughts?
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com