Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV & KVM support
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
libvirt-cim-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-21 23:16:27:
> Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
> > # Date 1208746833 -28800
> > # Node ID 359a198f236c0733587423009200fcde5c2a02f3
> > # Parent 0d31dff13ae341fd6515dc844ee98c7b5300b71d
> > [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV
> & KVM support
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol(a)cn.ibm.com>
> >
>
> This fails for me on F9 using KVM and latest sources.
This fails because of the InstanceID of ProcResourceAllocationSettingData,
the "proc_rasd" is set by '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0) in 02, which can be
passed
on Xen, actually, the InstanceID has to be update as %(test_dom,
"proc"), right?
Then it passes on KVM, fails on Xen. Below is the output of wbemein.
I forgot to note in my previous mail - the patch worked for me when I
tested with Xen.
wbemein
http://root:password@localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationS...
localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.InstanceID="Domain-0/0"
localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.InstanceID="Domain-0/1"
Are you testing with current sources?
I will fix the InstanceID in tc, then would you please apply it?
I didn't apply that patch yet - the commit message confused me (see my
other mail).
Thanks!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com