Don't we need to include the changeset number and revision number before
including this field ?
I think if we run this version on the F9, will it not fail ?
Regards,
Deepti
zli(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
# Date 1208509526 -28800
# Node ID 4ee138efe1ef8332366db16b30fd777bae8b2a08
# Parent 1fc0ff2248ae99860b83abb5ce8952df82218798
[TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init
Provider code already has this NetRASD Address as the mac.
Signed-off-by: Zhengang Li <lizg(a)cn.ibm.com>
diff -r 1fc0ff2248ae -r 4ee138efe1ef suites/libvirt-cim/lib/XenKvmLib/vsms.py
--- a/suites/libvirt-cim/lib/XenKvmLib/vsms.py Fri Apr 18 17:00:16 2008 +0800
+++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/lib/XenKvmLib/vsms.py Fri Apr 18 17:05:26 2008 +0800
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ def get_dasd_class(virt):
class CIM_NetResourceAllocationSettingData(CIMClassMOF):
def __init__(self, type, mac, name):
+ self.Address = mac
self.NetworkType = type
if type == 'ethernet' or type == 'bridge' :
self.ResourceType = RASD_TYPE_NET_ETHER
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim