Heidi Eckhart wrote:
Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
> Heidi Eckhart wrote:
>> Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Kaitlin Rupert <karupert(a)us.ibm.com>
>>> # Date 1201801531 28800
>>> # Node ID e27208a0ac3f69df3f704ecd32fdfdc78b79dc7c
>>> # Parent b8d69e734306e618b4efb53e23c17ffdd8bab128
>>> (2) Remove the embedded object parsing pieces from
>>> VirtualSystemManagmentService.
>>>
>>> Updates from set 1 to set 2:
>>> Removed unsused sys_op from define_system()
>>> Removed unused list from update_resource_setting()
>>> Changed CMPIArray **out_arr to **ret_arr in rasd_refs_to_insts()
>>>
>>>
>> Opps, sorry, I'm sure I was not very clear on what I meant with the
>> out_arr. I thought something like this might look better in the code
>> ... instead of submitting *out_arr submitting a ret_arr (which itself
>> becomes the content of *out_arr at the end).
>
> Oh, yes - I did misunderstand. Thanks for the clarification. =)
>
> However, I'm not sure what benefit this gives us. I think I'm missing
> something - does this change prevent an error condition of some sort?
No, absolutely not. Its only for common look and feel of the code. I see
a lot of functions, where an incoming "<type> **param" is handled
internally as "<type> *_param" which is set as "*param=_param"
at the
end. So I thought this is some kind of common for the providers. That's
all.
Oh, I see. Sure, I'll send a new patch. =)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com