Jim, So you are saying that we should not use Xen_HostSystem and that it cannot be relied on? I am dealing with existing code that references the Xen_HostSystem successfully on SLES10sp2 with libvirt-cim-0.4.1 installed, which is now broken in SLES 11 with libvirt-cim-0.5.2. The SLES 10sp2 system is running tog-Pegasus where the SLES 11 system is running SFCB. I was hoping for compatibility from one release to another. Perhaps the choice of using Xen_HostSystem was a bad one? I am trying to determine if I have found a bug in what is included in SLES 11 or if I may be missing some unidentified dependency or configurations. Thoughts? Thanks for your insights. Dayne
-----Original Message----- From: libvirt-cim-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-cim- bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jim Fehlig Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:56 PM To: List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM Subject: Re: [Libvirt-cim] On SLES 11 with SFCB Xen_HostSystem returns no instances
Medlyn, Dayne (VSL - Ft Collins) wrote:
In the SLES 11 distribution Novell is distributing libvirt-cim-0.5.2- 8.46 and registering it with the SFCB CIMOM. Does anyone know why the enumeration of Xen_HostSystem returns no instances? I could not find any mention of this on the mailing list.
The host is Linux_ComputerSystem instance in /root/cimv2. VMs are associated to the host with Xen_HostedDependency association.
Jim
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim