Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 4 of 6] [TEST] update processor id in SettingsDefine01~03 to reflect recent provider changes

> diff -r 682ad781e5b0 -r 248707005ae8 suites/libvirt- cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py Thu Apr 10 18:55:50 2008 -0700 > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py Thu Apr 10 19:01:00 2008 -0700 > @@ -186,13 +186,13 @@ def main(): > > global rasd_devid > rasd_devid = { > - 'ProcResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' % (test_dom, test_vcpus-1), > + 'ProcResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' % (test_dom, 'proc'), > 'NetResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' % (test_dom, test_mac), > 'DiskResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' % (test_dom, test_disk), > 'MemResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' % (test_dom, 'mem')} Daisy, can you resend this patch so that it only has this change?

I believe the recent provider changes should have only affected the InstanceID of the ProcRASD class, and not the Processor class InstanceID as well. So, the Processor related changes shouldn't be necessary. -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim