Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 2 of 2] [CU] Improve std_indication's raise functionality
Dan Smith wrote:
JG> # HG changeset patch
JG> # User Jay Gagnon <grendel(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
JG> # Date 1201882988 18000
JG> # Node ID 8669586635358e4858e56fe2dec8587af784cd47
JG> # Parent ec7428b062f45db8eef730c5398d061d8731ce60
JG> [CU] Improve std_indication's raise functionality
This one looks okay to me, and I think I can apply it independently of
the other, correct?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Yea, this should be able to go
in independently. Migration is the only
indication that uses raise, so we won't be pulling the rug out from
under anybody.
--
-Jay