I am OK with it, thank u for taking the maintainer role, I know that is an energy consuming work. :|
I don't now why but the list manager bounced and discarded the mail from Anthony to this list, so I'm sending it again.
As stated I'm fine taking over maintainance for the project (releases, some patch review and commits) but if there is a regain of activity and someone show commitment I will be fine handing maintainance over :-)
W.r.t. closing the list, I think we need a grace period to allow people to express dissent if needed (the libvir-list has far more traffic) and I will send a couple of reminders before closing if there is no opposition.
I guess the fist thing I will do is push the patch from Klaus fixing the build with sblim-sfcb,
feedback welcome !
Daniel
----- Forwarded message from Anthony Liguori<aliguori@us.ibm.com> -----
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:46:09 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori<aliguori@us.ibm.com> To: libvirt-cim@redhat.com CC: Daniel Veillard<veillard@redhat.com>, Dave Allan<dallan@redhat.com> Subject: Future of libvirt-cim
Hi,
As some of you may have noticed by the lack of activity on the libvirt-cim ML over the past month, we have decided at IBM to focus on direct consumption of libvirt and oVirt related interfaces meaning that we've stopped actively working on libvirt-cim.
Having discussed it a little bit with DV et al, I think it would make sense to close this mailing list and move the traffic to the main libvirt as is done with the other libvirt sub projects.
I also think it would make sense to open up commit access to have the same rules as the main libvirt repository does.
Does that sound reasonable?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
----- End forwarded message -----
-- Best Regards Wayne Xia mail:xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com tel:86-010-82450803