Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
====================================== CIM Test Report for XenFV ====================================== Distro : RHEL 5.2 Beta Kernel : 2.6.18-88.el5xen Xen version : 3.1.2-88.el5 Libvirt : libvirt-0.3.3-7.el5 CIMOM : pegasus PyWBEM : pywbem-3.14 CIM Schema : cimv216Experimental LibCMPIutil : 72 LibVirtCIM : 545 CIMTEST : 85 ====================================== PASS : 54 FAIL : 45 (Test cases FAIL because of finally issue: 19 )
Wow, this is brutal even considering the 19 failures due to the finally issue (that patch is in the tree now). 2 failed due to a provider not installed properly. 2 failed due to the "Address" issue you noted in response to Dan's emulator patch.
XFAIL : 2 SKIP : 30 ----------------- Total : 129 ======================================
Detailed Report ================ Cleaned log files. Testing XenFV hypervisor AllocationCapabilities - 01_enum.py: PASS AllocationCapabilities - 02_alloccap_gi_errs.py: PASS ComputerSystem - 01_enum.py: PASS ComputerSystem - 02_nosystems.py: PASS ComputerSystem - 03_defineVS.py: FAIL ComputerSystem - 04_defineStartVS.py: FAIL ComputerSystem - 05_activate_defined_start.py: XFAIL Bug: 85769 ComputerSystem - 06_paused_active_suspend.py: FAIL InvokeMethod(RequestStateChange): CIM_ERR_FAILED: Domain not running
This is interesting.. I wonder if the domain dying before it can be paused? Several other tests report errors related to a missing domain (VirtualSystemManagementService - 02_destroysystem.py, VirtualSystemManagementService - 05_destroysystem_neg.py). Did see similar error in the logs for the other failing tests? Thanks for the run! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com