Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init
Dan Smith wrote:
DK> Don't we need to include the changeset number and revision
number
DK> before including this field ? I think if we run this version on
DK> the F9, will it not fail ?
No, it won't fail just because you give it more information than it
needs, it just won't use that value.
Yep, this worked fine for me on F9 with a release rpm.
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com