Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 2] [RFC] First steps in new processor RASD behavior

JG> Just want to get this out before I start in on the resource JG> add/mod/del stuff, to see if I'm on the right track. The idea JG> here is that we are not supporting processor pinning, will support JG> scheduling (weight/limit attributes), and are making Processor JG> RASDs one-per-domain. Does this look sane? I haven't tested it yet (I can tomorrow), but this looks sane to me. Thanks! -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com