Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
Jay Gagnon wrote:
>> @@ -264,7 +265,7 @@ static CMPIStatus GetInstance(CMPIInstan
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - inst = get_rasd_instance(context, ref, id, type);
>> + inst = get_rasd_instance(context, ref, _BROKER, id, type);
>>
> Think you got the wrong broker there. Should be broker, not _BROKER,
> right? Everything else looks fine. Assuming that _BROKER gets taken
> care of, it's +1 from me.
>
The way the patch was generated made this piece confusing.
get_rasd_instance() is being called from the GetInstance() function in
Virt_RASD.c. Anytime a provider calls get_rasd_instance(), it will
need to pass it's own _BROKER.
Ah, I see now. My bad. :)
--
-Jay