Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Make CS.RequestStateChange() agree to proceed if RUNNING|BLOCKED
Dan Smith wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Dan Smith <danms(a)us.ibm.com>
# Date 1201026051 28800
# Node ID c92db5f8d2b108163d75b32f906c7b55fa4f2854
# Parent 335e7862efa1f3cffce393e684179ec6cc8ee4a4
Make CS.RequestStateChange() agree to proceed if RUNNING|BLOCKED
This is an interesting Xen quirk propagated through libvirt. For the
most part, RUNNING and BLOCKED are the same thing to us.
This is a good catch. Seems reasonable to be able to suspend, etc when
the guest is blocked as well as running. +1
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com