Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Make CS.RequestStateChange() agree to proceed if RUNNING|BLOCKED

23 Jan 2008


      Dan Smith wrote:
...
# HG changeset patch
# User Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>
# Date 1201026051 28800
# Node ID c92db5f8d2b108163d75b32f906c7b55fa4f2854
# Parent  335e7862efa1f3cffce393e684179ec6cc8ee4a4
Make CS.RequestStateChange() agree to proceed if RUNNING|BLOCKED
This is an interesting Xen quirk propagated through libvirt.  For the
most part, RUNNING and BLOCKED are the same thing to us.
This is a good catch. Seems reasonable to be able to suspend, etc when 
the guest is blocked as well as running. +1

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com