Dan Smith wrote:
KR> # HG changeset patch KR> # User Kaitlin Rupert <karupert@us.ibm.com> KR> # Date 1199740240 28800 KR> # Node ID 7281142059a1c419405addd2ba351c68fb719ff0 KR> # Parent abcb596636c9530009756b1aa1e8900a2f01d10e KR> Replace printf() with CU_DEBUG in EAFP.
I'm all for cleanups of this fashion. However,
KR> - printf("Device %hhi:%s", type, dev_id); KR> + CU_DEBUG("Device %hhi:%s", type, dev_id);
This looks like crufty debug that uses a platform-dependent bit-width anyway. This and the rest in this file should probably be excised instead of formalized. What do you think?
I can't really comment on the necessity of these particular statements, but is there a way for use to print that value in a platform-independent way? -- -Jay