Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Fix RASD provider unregistration

KR> Since <>_ResourceAllocationSettingData is listed first in the mof, KR> it doesn't get properly unregistered because KR> <>_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData (etc) hasn't been KR> unregistered yet. Is this sfcb or Pegasus-related? KR> +# This definition is needed during provider unregistration KR> +RASD_MOF = schema/ResourceAllocationSettingData.mof KR> +RASD_REG = schema/ResourceAllocationSettingData.registration Perhaps we should call this "REREG_MOF" and "REREG_REG" or some such? We could potentially have this hit us in schema other than the RASDs. In fact, I think we probably should have had an intermediate class in most of our schema, where we have a Virt_Foo and inherit the LXC_, Xen_, KVM_, etc classes from that. If we move to that in the future, we'll have this problem everywhere. Maybe moving the intermediate abstract classes to their own MOF would be better than re-running the deregistration step? -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com