Re: [Libvirt-cim] KVM test report on Fedora 9 (4/21)

Zhengang Li wrote: > Distro: Fedora 9 Beta > Kernel: 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 > Libvirt: 0.4.1-7.fc9 > CIMOM: 2.7.0-6.fc9 > PyWBEM: 0.6-1 > libcmpiutil: 0.3-1.fc9 > libvirt-cim: 0.3-4.fc9 > cimtest: changeset-102 > > =========FAIL============= > AllocationCapabilities - 02_alloccap_gi_errs.py: FAIL > "Requested Object could not be found." vs. "Instance not found." error > string issue. The return code is correct. > [Known Issue] > > ComputerSystemIndication - 01_created_indication.py: FAIL > Exception : Authentication (or request) Failed! > Previous tests were always on sfcb. Anyone has a successful experience > on pegasus for indication?danms(a)us.ibm.com I submitted a patch for this, which has been applied. Can someone update the indication_tester in the cimtest tree and test this out?

Thanks! > > ElementAllocatedFromPool - 03_reverse_errs.py: FAIL > exp: ERR_NOT_FOUND(6) - No such instance > ret: ERR_FAILED(1) - Invalid InstanceID or unsupported pool type > > ElementConforms - 02_reverse.py: FAIL > Binary rpm provider returns CIM_ERR_INVALID_PARAMETER: > KVM_ElementConformsToProfile on the following query: > wbemain -ac KVM_ElementConformsToProfile > 'http://u:p@host:5988/root/virt:KVM_ComputerSystem. CreationClassName="KVM_ComputerSystem",Name="domgst"' > > Same wbemcli command gets the correct results on another system using > latest libvirt-cim tree (changeset 533). > Most of these issues appear to be due to a change in the providers, which is to be expected. -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim