Deepti B. Kalakeri wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Deepti B. Kalakeri <deeptik@linux.vnet.ibm.com> # Date 1208959848 -19800 # Node ID 0123ff5809dc099c0b7840fce65eca5bce0921e6 # Parent 254b9bf3dacaf1dc3b89a08069cad74ee1b3122f [TEST] Moving conf_file, clean_up_restore() and print_error to library.
Sorry Deepti - I missed you mail saying to ignore the print_error patch. I already applied that patch. I was confused because SDC 04 and 05 depended on this change. While missing this is completely my error - I should note that it helps to send related / dependent patches in a set. Since the SDC 04 and 05 patches were dependent on the print_error change, they could have been sent together. Doing this helps indicate that the patches have an order they need to be applied in. Sometimes mail relays slow down, and so the patches don't always arrive at the same time. Anyway - sorry to make you rework this! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin@linux.vnet.ibm.com