16 Nov
2007
16 Nov
'07
9:35 p.m.
Dan Smith wrote:
A more formal version of the last set, this time as a proposed change instead of an RFC. Some testing of the first patch would be good to make sure that I didn't change a provider name to be incongruent with what is in the registration files.
_______________________________________________ Libvirt-cim mailing list Libvirt-cim@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
I think this set looks good - using the libvirt_cim_init() call is a nice way to handle this. +1 -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center karupert@us.ibm.com