Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST].2# update processor id to reflect recent provider changes

Guo Lian Yun wrote: Sorry Daisy - I didn't realize this patch was a resend of your previous patch set. Sorry for the confusion. Usually, if a patchset needs to be reworked, the entire set is resent. However, I didn't finish reviewing your patches, which caused some confusion. My mistake there. =) You can either resend patch 4 (of the previous set), or you can modify this patch to just include the changes the ProcRASD related changes to suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py. Either way is fine. Thanks! -- Kaitlin Rupert IBM Linux Technology Center kaitlin(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com