Re: [Libvirt-cim] cimtest results.

> > On 10/26/2011 08:07 PM, snmishra(a)us.ibm.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I see bunch of tests failing after I get cimtest from upstream and apply > > the following patches - > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2011-October/msg00051.html > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2011-October/msg00052.html > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2011-October/msg00045.html > > > > > > If I run cimtest from rev 879 (which is upstream minus latest 4 patches) > > and compare the results with the run using latest upstream plus above > > three patches I see following extra failures - > > > > VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py: FAIL > > VirtualSystemManagementService - 09_procrasd_persist.py: FAIL > > VirtualSystemManagementService - 11_define_memrasdunits.py: FAIL > > VirtualSystemManagementService - 31_unset_netrasd.py: FAIL > > VirtualSystemManagementService - 32_modify_cdrom_media.py: FAIL > > KVMRedirectionSAP - 01_enum_KVMredSAP.py: FAIL > > > > I understand that 31_* and 32_* are new tests and that is the reason I > > did not see them in my run with older rev. But we need to figure out why > > these tests are failing. > > > > The buggy patch is 883 ([TEST] XenKvmLib: Add cdrom device description > to domain) and it looks weird that you actually ran revision 879 as it > should not include VSMS 31 and 32. Can you try again with revision 882? When I wrote "older rev" above, I meant rev 879. I did not see 31_ and 32_ in rev 879 and that is understandable since those tests were added in later rev. I am trying to understand why above tests are failing with 883 + cimtest patches on list (the three I pointed out above)?