Re: [Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 3] Transition back to connect_by_classname()
Dan Smith wrote:
A more formal version of the last set, this time as a proposed
change
instead of an RFC. Some testing of the first patch would be good to make
sure that I didn't change a provider name to be incongruent with what is
in the registration files.
_______________________________________________
Libvirt-cim mailing list
Libvirt-cim(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
I think this set looks good - using the libvirt_cim_init() call is a
nice way to handle this. +1
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert(a)us.ibm.com