6:51 p.m.
I was taught in kitty school that running a ntp server in a vm
was a bad idea. Is that still the case?
8:14 p.m.
Hi,
It is still a bad idea. I invite you to read here for the reasons why:
http://serverfault.com/a/106509/150152
Cheers,
On 09/12/2014 12:51 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I was taught in kitty school that running a ntp server in a vm
was a bad idea. Is that still the case?
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
--
Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org>
System & Network Administrator
Senior Kernel Developer
ReactOS Deutschland e.V.
8:25 p.m.
While I agree that running a time server in a VM is, at best, problematic,
most of those nay-sayers have experience with VMware, xen and the like.
Those aren't the only hypervisors out there, and the decision process
should depend upon the hypervisor (to a significant degree), not just the
idea of "can I do this in a VM?" Not all hypervisors are created equally.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org>
wrote:
Hi,
It is still a bad idea. I invite you to read here for the reasons why:
http://serverfault.com/a/106509/150152
Cheers,
On 09/12/2014 12:51 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> I was taught in kitty school that running a ntp server in a vm
> was a bad idea. Is that still the case?
>
> _______________________________________________
> libvirt-users mailing list
> libvirt-users(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
--
Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org>
System & Network Administrator
Senior Kernel Developer
ReactOS Deutschland e.V.
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
3648
days inactive
3648
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gary Hook -
Mauricio Tavares -
Pierre Schweitzer