4:36 p.m.
Hi all,
I have a question about internal qcow2 snapshots of a live/running
virtual machine taken via "qemu-img snapshot command".
My question is: is it safe to execute the command above against a
running machine? Or it will cause corruption? Naively I think it should
*not* be safe, however, I would like a direct confirmation.
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
4:13 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:36:52AM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about internal qcow2 snapshots of a live/running
virtual machine taken via "qemu-img snapshot command".
My question is: is it safe to execute the command above against a
running machine? Or it will cause corruption? Naively I think it should
*not* be safe, however, I would like a direct confirmation.
It is not safe.
For a running domain, you need to go through libvirt and also save the
memory of the VM - doing just the disk snapshot for a running machine
would be an equivalent of copying a physical hard drive after pulling
out the power cord.
Jan
9:55 p.m.
Il 15-03-2018 09:13 Ján Tomko ha scritto:
It is not safe.
For a running domain, you need to go through libvirt and also save the
memory of the VM - doing just the disk snapshot for a running machine
would be an equivalent of copying a physical hard drive after pulling
out the power cord.
Jan
Hi Jan, I 100% agree that taking a snapshot without dumping the memory
content would be akin to "pulling the plug" on the guest.
However, I was speaking about disk image file consistency. In other
words: does taking a snapshot of an in-use virtual disk have a chance to
corrupt the *original* disk Qcow2 image file?
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
11:49 p.m.
On 03/15/2018 08:55 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Il 15-03-2018 09:13 Ján Tomko ha scritto:
> It is not safe.
>
> For a running domain, you need to go through libvirt and also save the
> memory of the VM - doing just the disk snapshot for a running machine
> would be an equivalent of copying a physical hard drive after pulling
> out the power cord.
>
> Jan
Hi Jan, I 100% agree that taking a snapshot without dumping the memory
content would be akin to "pulling the plug" on the guest.
However, I was speaking about disk image file consistency. In other
words: does taking a snapshot of an in-use virtual disk have a chance to
corrupt the *original* disk Qcow2 image file?
Yes, having two processes (in this case, the qemu process under
libvirt's control, and the qemu-img process) both trying to write to a
single qcow2 file at once is a recipe for disaster. You are VERY likely
to cause irreparable disk corruption; although at least newer
qemu/qemu-io binaries now use file locking to at least fail up front
when they detect that another process has the image open for writing,
rather than letting you shoot yourself in the foot.
The only SAFE way to take a snapshot of a running virtual machine is
through commands issued to the qemu process that is running the machine
(that is, via libvirt APIs if libvirt is managing the qemu process).
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
5:21 p.m.
On 15/03/2018 16:49, Eric Blake wrote:
Yes, having two processes (in this case, the qemu process under
libvirt's control, and the qemu-img process) both trying to write to a
single qcow2 file at once is a recipe for disaster. You are VERY likely
to cause irreparable disk corruption; although at least newer
qemu/qemu-io binaries now use file locking to at least fail up front
when they detect that another process has the image open for writing,
rather than letting you shoot yourself in the foot.
The only SAFE way to take a snapshot of a running virtual machine is
through commands issued to the qemu process that is running the machine
(that is, via libvirt APIs if libvirt is managing the qemu process).
Roger :)
Thanks so much, Eric.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
2367
days inactive
2369
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Eric Blake -
Gionatan Danti -
Ján Tomko