8:32 p.m.
Hello:
Yesterday I yum update libvirt from 0.9.10 to 0.10.2 ,after update I got
some error in libvirtd.log
like this:
2013-05-10 07:39:09.440+0000: 18824: warning : virCgroupMoveTask:885 : no
vm cgroup in controller 3
2013-05-10 07:39:09.440+0000: 18824: warning : virCgroupMoveTask:885 : no
vm cgroup in controller 4
2013-05-10 07:39:09.440+0000: 18824: warning : virCgroupMoveTask:885 : no
vm cgroup in controller 6
so,I restarted cgconfig and libvirtd daemon :
service cgconfig restart ;
service libvirtd restart
after that ,I cannot create snapshot for vm anymore.and error log message
below:
2013-05-16 01:13:23.638+0000: 28848: error :
qemuDomainSnapshotCreateDiskActive:11299 : internal error Unable to find
cgroup for vm1
my version info :
# rpm -q libvirt
libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.4.x86_64
# rpm -q qemu-kvm
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6_3.1.x86_64
in /cgroup dir I cannot find anything about vm1.how can I recover the
missing cgroup for vm ?
thanks !
8:55 p.m.
On 05/15/2013 07:32 PM, Gao Yongwei wrote:
Hello:
Yesterday I yum update libvirt from 0.9.10 to 0.10.2 ,after update I got
some error in libvirtd.log
like this:
2013-05-10 07:39:09.440+0000: 18824: warning : virCgroupMoveTask:885 : no
vm cgroup in controller 3
2013-05-10 07:39:09.440+0000: 18824: warning : virCgroupMoveTask:885 : no
vm cgroup in controller 4
2013-05-10 07:39:09.440+0000: 18824: warning : virCgroupMoveTask:885 : no
vm cgroup in controller 6
Red herring. This is a warning, and has nothing to do with the actual
error (it has since been patched in upstream libvirt).
so,I restarted cgconfig and libvirtd daemon :
service cgconfig restart ;
service libvirtd restart
after that ,I cannot create snapshot for vm anymore.and error log message
below:
2013-05-16 01:13:23.638+0000: 28848: error :
qemuDomainSnapshotCreateDiskActive:11299 : internal error Unable to find
cgroup for vm1
my version info :
# rpm -q libvirt
libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.4.x86_64
Are you using RHEL? If so, please open a support incident with Red Hat.
If not, can you reproduce the problem when you upgrade to libvirt 1.0.5?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
9:08 p.m.
Are you using RHEL? If so, please open a support incident with Red Hat.
If not, can you reproduce the problem when you upgrade to libvirt
1.0.5?
Hello Blake ,I am using CentOS6.4 ,but I got this trouble in
my production
environment .
I will test 1.0.5 later ,now I am very worried ;(
10:20 p.m.
2013/5/16 Gao Yongwei <itxx00(a)gmail.com>
Are you using RHEL? If so, please open a support incident with Red Hat.
> If not, can you reproduce the problem when you upgrade to libvirt 1.0.5?
>
> Hello Blake ,I am using CentOS6.4 ,but I got this trouble in
my production environment .
I will test 1.0.5 later ,now I am very worried ;(
Hello Blake, I've submited a new bug :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963514
thanks.
11:32 p.m.
2013/5/16 Gao Yongwei <itxx00(a)gmail.com>
2013/5/16 Gao Yongwei <itxx00(a)gmail.com>
>
>
>
> Are you using RHEL? If so, please open a support incident with Red Hat.
>> If not, can you reproduce the problem when you upgrade to libvirt 1.0.5?
>>
>> Hello Blake ,I am using CentOS6.4 ,but I got this trouble in
> my production environment .
> I will test 1.0.5 later ,now I am very worried ;(
>
> Hello Blake, I've submited a new bug :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963514
thanks.
Hello Blake ,here are some debug log info : http://paste.ubuntu.com/5669714/
thanks.
2:32 p.m.
On 05/15/2013 10:32 PM, Gao Yongwei wrote:
>> Are you using RHEL? If so, please open a support incident
with Red Hat.
>>> If not, can you reproduce the problem when you upgrade to libvirt 1.0.5?
>>>
>>> Hello Blake ,I am using CentOS6.4 ,but I got this trouble in
>> my production environment .
>> I will test 1.0.5 later ,now I am very worried ;(
>>
>> Hello Blake, I've submited a new bug :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963514
> thanks.
>
Hello Blake ,here are some debug log info : http://paste.ubuntu.com/5669714/
An ubuntu pastebin for a CentOS issue seems a bit... odd.
Unfortunately, pastebins tend to expire, so linking to them in mail
isn't always the most reliable, compared to just pasting relevant
sections inline.
2013-05-16 04:08:11.063+0000: 21636: debug :
qemuDomainObjBeginJobInternal:813 : Starting async job: snapshot
2013-05-16 04:08:11.103+0000: 21636: debug : virFileClose:72 : Closed fd 23
2013-05-16 04:08:11.103+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupNew:617 : New
group /libvirt/qemu/testvm
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 0:cpu at /cgroup/cpu in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 1:cpuacct at /cgroup/cpuacct in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 2:cpuset at /cgroup/cpuset in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 3:memory at /cgroup/memory in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 4:devices at /cgroup/devices in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 5:freezer at /cgroup/freezer in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 6:blkio at /cgroup/blkio in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupMakeGroup:535 :
Make group /libvirt/qemu/testvm
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupMakeGroup:560 :
Make controller /cgroup/cpu/libvirt/qemu/testvm/
2013-05-16 04:08:11.106+0000: 21636: error :
qemuDomainSnapshotCreateDiskActive:11299 : internal error Unable to find
cgroup for testvm
2013-05-16 04:08:11.106+0000: 21636: debug : qemuProcessStartCPUs:2825 :
Using lock state '(null)'
At this point, all I can say is that our logging for cgroups is LOUSY.
Can you retry with the just-released 1.0.5.1 or even libvirt.git, as it
makes no sense trying to debug stale versions unless we can prove the
problem also affects the latest? There have been some recent cgroups
patches.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
7:57 p.m.
An ubuntu pastebin for a CentOS issue seems a bit... odd.
Unfortunately, pastebins tend to expire, so linking to them in mail
isn't always the most reliable, compared to just pasting relevant
sections inline.
2013-05-16 04:08:11.063+0000: 21636: debug :
qemuDomainObjBeginJobInternal:813 : Starting async job: snapshot
2013-05-16 04:08:11.103+0000: 21636: debug : virFileClose:72 : Closed fd 23
2013-05-16 04:08:11.103+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupNew:617 : New
group /libvirt/qemu/testvm
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 0:cpu at /cgroup/cpu in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 1:cpuacct at /cgroup/cpuacct in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 2:cpuset at /cgroup/cpuset in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 3:memory at /cgroup/memory in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 4:devices at /cgroup/devices in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 5:freezer at /cgroup/freezer in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupDetect:273 :
Detected mount/mapping 6:blkio at /cgroup/blkio in
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupMakeGroup:535 :
Make group /libvirt/qemu/testvm
2013-05-16 04:08:11.105+0000: 21636: debug : virCgroupMakeGroup:560 :
Make controller /cgroup/cpu/libvirt/qemu/testvm/
2013-05-16 04:08:11.106+0000: 21636: error :
qemuDomainSnapshotCreateDiskActive:11299 : internal error Unable to find
cgroup for testvm
2013-05-16 04:08:11.106+0000: 21636: debug : qemuProcessStartCPUs:2825 :
Using lock state '(null)'
At this point, all I can say is that our logging for cgroups is LOUSY.
Can you retry with the just-released 1.0.5.1 or even libvirt.git, as it
makes no sense trying to debug stale versions unless we can prove the
problem also affects the latest? There have been some recent cgroups
patches.
Thanks. :-) I'll try 1.0.5.1 later.
4233
days inactive
4239
days old
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Eric Blake -
Gao Yongwei