Hi, I just tested by using "unix virtio" channel instead of pty. It looks easier to handle. Thx for help. Regards, J.P. -----Message d'origine----- De : libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com] De la part de libvirt-users-request@redhat.com Envoyé : mercredi 26 août 2015 15:38 À : libvirt-users@redhat.com Objet : libvirt-users Digest, Vol 68, Issue 26 Send libvirt-users mailing list submissions to libvirt-users@redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to libvirt-users-request@redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at libvirt-users-owner@redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of libvirt-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Isolated networks && test lab (Spanky Horawitz) 2. Re: On which /dev/pts/x is channel source mapped ? (Pierre Schweitzer) 3. Virtio serial exposition (Jean-Pierre Ribeauville) 4. Re: On which /dev/pts/x is channel source mapped ? (Daniel P. Berrange) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:17:56 -0700 From: Spanky Horawitz <shorawitz@gmail.com> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com Subject: [libvirt-users] Isolated networks && test lab Message-ID: <1440548276.17239.68.camel@psdchristensen> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm trying to migrate my VirtualBox test lab to KVM. In my VB configuration, I have several VM routers with 4 interfaces each. Each router has a bridged interface which connects them all together and to the outside world. I have servers/clients dispersed on each of the other private (Isolated) segments that use the routers as default gateways. In trying to make this work, I used Virtual Machine Manager to define 3x Virtual Networks (Isolated networks) and created a VM router which has 3 interfaces (192.168.x.1) on each Isolated network and a 4th interface using the br0 interface to get to the outside world. The router is able to connect to the outside world. Using Virtual Machine Manager, I also created "client" VM and connected it's single interface to one of the Isolated networks. While testing connectivity of the "client" VM to the router, it seems to go straight to the Host (tested using 'ssh 192.168.x.1'.) I'm trying to isolate the networks from the Host and have the router receive packets for the 192.168.x.1 address on the individual Isolated network segments. Host: br0 (em1): 192.168.1.16 vibr0 (default): 192.168.122.1 virbr1: 192.168.2.1 virbr2: 192.168.3.1 virbr3: 192.168.4.1 VM router: eth0: 192.168.1.10 eth1: 192.168.2.1 eth2: 192.168.3.1 eth3: 192.168.4.1 VM client: eth0: 192.168.3.101 Is there some trick to isolate the Host from the VM's? Is there a comprehensive guide that explains how the networks should be setup (with/without Virtual Machine Manager)? I'm not afraid to get my hands dirty on the console if needed, but GUI's are easier to navigate when you're learning a new technology. I switched to using RemoteBox for managing my VB vm's as it made things a lot easier to deal with than VBoxManage. Thanks for your help!