[libvirt-users] virConnectListAllDomains support for PowerVM
Hey guys, I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, it simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some technical hardship? Best, Camilo Aguilar
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:44:47PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, it simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some technical hardship?
I believe it was probably just an oversight - our intention was that the new API worked with all drivers. Feel free to send a patch for phyp if you think you can manage to write the code. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
I'm writing Go bindings, I was just wondering about PowerVM, maybe further ahead if nobody has done it I could give it a try. So, Does it mean the other functions more granular funtions are going to be deprecated at some point? On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:44:47PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, it simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some technical hardship?
I believe it was probably just an oversight - our intention was that the new API worked with all drivers. Feel free to send a patch for phyp if you think you can manage to write the code.
Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/:| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org:| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/:| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc:|
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:35:10PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
I'm writing Go bindings, I was just wondering about PowerVM, maybe further ahead if nobody has done it I could give it a try. So, Does it mean the other functions more granular funtions are going to be deprecated at some point?
Libvirt generally doesn't have any policy of explicitly deprecating things unless they were totally broken by design. We just recommend people use the best API that suits their needs. We certainly will not ever remove any APIs either. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
participants (2)
-
Camilo Aguilar -
Daniel P. Berrange