Re: [libvirt-users] mlocate/updatedb and btrfs subvolume mounts

I've just noticed that I'm having issues with finding files using "locate" when those files are on btrfs subvolume mounts. The issue is that updatedb cannot discern the difference between a btrfs bind mount and btrfs subvolume [1]. This generally means that if you're using btrfs subvolume mounts and updatedb at the same time, and you want to index those subvolumes, you'll need to set PRUNE_BIND_MOUNTS to 0 or "no". And then deal with all the cruft that causes. From the bug above, you can see that the RedHat dev Michal Sekletar is out of ideas. I'm not sure if he's reached out here or not... and if not, he might welcome some help from the folks on this list. Regrads, Richard [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906591#c30