Memory locking limit and zero-copy migrations

Hi, do I read libvirt sources right that when <memtune> is not used in the libvirt domain then libvirt takes proper care about setting memory locking limits when zero-copy is requested for a migration? I also wonder whether there are any other situations where memory limits could be set by libvirt or QEMU automatically rather than having no memory limits? We had oVirt bugs in the past where certain VMs with VFIO devices couldn't be started due to extra requirements on the amount of locked memory and adding <hard_limit> to the domain apparently helped. Thanks, Milan