For my needs I would like to see either vdeswitch or openvswitch integrated in the project. Is there any preference from the users/developers on which one of those I should start looking into? Also I would like to know how this should be integrated, from the mails I can see devs prefers to have virtual switch present as a network. Can someone describe how the integration should be done? Support for additional features like vlan, QoS? Robert On 04/06/2011 04:13 PM, Robert Šmol wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 06/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a thread from http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to work on it these days.
Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave libvirt.
On #IRC I got point to message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What is the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into libvirt? The patch wasn't merged but the why is a question to the maintainers. I guess the way it was implemented did not convinced. This is what I understand from the whole thread, at least.
From the thread it seems the maintainers would like to have a network based on VDE. To me it also looks like better idea (create vde network and then just attach the domain to a network.
-- stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners http://www.stereoit.com mobile: +420 776 762378