On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 11:46 +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:05:16AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Interesting. What is the output of 'virsh capabilities'?
In attachment.
Looks reasonable enough.
> More interesting still is the fact that the guest XML you
shared
> looks like an *active* XML, ie. one taken from a running guest...
> Does that mean the guest can start even though it's using the 2.11
> machine type?
No, of course it doesn't; the guest is running because I `virsh-edit`ed
it to use 2.10 machine type :-)
Should have noticed that.
Welp, I'm fresh out of ideas then :/
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization