Re: [libvirt-users] Libvirtd dead, pid still exists. ( Problem might be with TLS interface of libvirtd )

On 05.04.2013 09:04, SHREE DUTH AWASTHI wrote: > GDB: > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0x00007f8591246005 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007f8591246005 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > #1 0x00007f8591248e40 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > #2 0x00007f8592a2fdc5 in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #3 0x00007f8592a303d5 in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #4 0x00007f8592a35697 in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #5 0x00007f8592a3579c in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #6 0x00007f8592a30a65 in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #7 0x00007f8592a30aa9 in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #8 0x00007f8592a30b19 in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #9 0x00007f8592a735df in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #10 0x00007f8592a7365f in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #11 0x00007f8592a6025a in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #12 0x00007f8592a6045a in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #13 0x00007f8592a3c1ef in ?? () from /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 > #14 0x00007f8592cd9d8c in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #15 0x00007f8592cc5e7a in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #16 0x00007f8592ccddd6 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #17 0x00007f8592cce67f in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #18 0x00007f8592ccedaf in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #19 0x00007f8592cbaf85 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #20 0x00007f8592cb6c55 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #21 0x00007f8592cb7437 in gnutls_handshake () from > /usr/lib64/libgnutls.so.26 > #22 0x00007f8593a5961b in virNetTLSSessionHandshake () from > /usr/lib64/libvirt.so.0 > The backstrace shows problem lies in libgcrypt library. So unless libvirt is overwriting some random memory areas, it's a libgcrypt's bug. Michal