On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:07 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
We should certainly document what I have summaries here properly at a central palce!
Please review the three edits I've submitted to the wiki: https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Special:Contributions/Fghaas
Feel free to ruthlessly edit/roll back anything that is inaccurate. Thanks!
I've made some minor edits to clarify a bunch of bits, and a link to the Kernel doc about Intel nVMX. (Hope that looks fine.)
I'm sure they it does, but just so you know I currently don't see any edits from you on the Nested Guests page. Are you sure you saved/published your changes?
You wrote: "L2...which does no further virtualization". Not quite true — "under right circumstances" (read: sufficiently huge machine with tons of RAM), L2 _can_ in turn L3. :-)
Insert "normally" between "which" and "does", then. :)
Last time I checked (this morning), Rich W.M. Jones had 4 levels of nesting tested with the 'supernested' program[1] he wrote. (Related aside: This program is packaged it as part of 2016 QEMU Advent Calendar[2] -- if you want to play around on a powerful test machine with tons of free memory.)
[1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=supernested.git;a=blob;f=README [2] http://www.qemu-advent-calendar.org/2016/#day-13
Interesting, thanks for the pointer! Cheers, Florian