Re: Guest cannot access host HTTP service in NAT

Hi, I hit a libvirt networking problem that guest cannot access host HTTP service. I debug this issue and tried some efforts. Thanks for your suggestions! Environment ------------- guest IP: 192.168.122.46 (Linux, default NAT, installed using virt-manager) host1 IP: 192.168.3.16 (Centos 8.5 running libvirt and qemu, default libvirt iptable rules) HTTP service: 192.168.3.16:70 (firewall rules have allowed this port) host2: 192.168.3.65:70 (for test only) guest network xml <interface type="network"> <mac address="52:54:00:f5:a8:9f"/> <source network="default" portid="6e8ce7e7-6517-43fa-b113-aaddb6c1bc08" bridge="virbr0"/> <target dev="vnet2"/> <model type="e1000"/> <alias name="net0"/> <address type="pci" domain="0x0000" bus="0x00" slot="0x03" function="0x0"/> </interface> 1. guest and host1/host2 can ping each other 2. *guest can visit host2 HTTP 3. *guest cannot visit host1 HTTP When I capture traffic in guest, Wireshark shows: 192.168.122.46 -> 192.168.3.16 // SYN ok 192.168.122.46 <- 192.168.3.16 // Destination unreachable (Port unreachable) guest route table: ------------------ Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.122.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 eth0 host1 route table: ------------------ Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 enp3s0 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 enp3s0 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 virbr0 I delete the last rule and add a rule to make sure host1 visits guests will go through 192.168.122.1 ------------------ Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface (other rules omitted) 192.168.122.0 192.168.122.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 virbr0 However, traceroute shows this new rule does not work (which should go to 192.168.122.1 first), and guest cannot visit host1 HTTP request. [!] guest visit http://192.168.3.16:70 does not go through 192.168.122.1 traceroute 192.168.122.46 traceroute to 192.168.122.46 (192.168.122.46), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 192.168.122.46 (192.168.122.46) 0.200 ms 0.194 ms 0.194 ms # guest visit http://192.168.3.65:70 goes through 192.168.122.1 traceroute 192.168.3.65 traceroute to 192.168.3.65 (192.168.3.65), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 192.168.122.1 (192.168.122.1) 0.244 ms 0.050 ms 0.120 ms 2 192.168.3.65 (192.168.3.65) 0.823 ms !X 0.802 ms !X 0.789 ms !X In sum, is there a way to force the guest go through 192.168.122.1 when visiting the hosting machine?

------------------- libvirt iptable rules: -P INPUT ACCEPT -P FORWARD ACCEPT -P OUTPUT ACCEPT -N LIBVIRT_INP -N LIBVIRT_OUT -N LIBVIRT_FWO -N LIBVIRT_FWI -N LIBVIRT_FWX -A INPUT -j LIBVIRT_INP -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWX -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWI -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWO -A OUTPUT -j LIBVIRT_OUT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.122.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable # delete this rule does not work -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.122.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable # delete this rule does not work -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT