On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:24 PM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 10:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:03:24PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
/usr/local/bin/rst2html5 --stylesheet= --strict docs/manpages/virsh.rst docs/manpages/virsh.rst:41: (ERROR/3) Error in "code-block"
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:31:09PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: directive:
1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
.. code-block::
virsh [OPTION]... <command> <domain> [ARG]...
This is a sign of having a bad version of "rst2html5" installed.
We expect to be using rst2html5 that comes with python docutils package.
Yeah, the python3-docutils Debian package will contain a working rst2html5 binary.
That's strange, my rst2html5 comes from docutils: python3-docutils: /usr/share/docutils/scripts/python3/rst2html5
and /usr/local/bin/rst2html5 --version rst2html5 (Docutils 0.16 [release], Python 3.8.2, on linux)
I wouldn't expect this to have been in /usr/local/bin - that is usually a sign of a local adminstrator install, via "pip" or some other means. The distro provided version would be in /usr/bin
I reinstalled it via "apt-get install python3-docutils", still the same error. Here is my check whereis rst2html5 rst2html5: /usr/bin/rst2html5 /usr/local/bin/rst2html5.py /usr/local/bin/rst2html5 /usr/share/man/man1/rst2html5.1.gz /usr/bin/rst2html5 is a link to /usr/share/docutils/scripts/python3/rst2html5 Thanks, Wei