Re: [libvirt-users] Network without forward mode

❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com&gt; : >>> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where >>> should the vnet be connected? >> >>The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an >>interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I >>want. > > I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to > achieve. Could you describe what are your trying to set up without > libvirt technicalities? I have a process watching libvirt event to add a route like "ip route add 192.0.2.147/32 dev vnet18" once the VM is spawned. The host is then responsible for any routing to/from the VM. I don't want the VM to be part of a bridge.

-- Indent to show the logical structure of a program. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)