Re: [libvirt-users] What is the difference between running "virt-manager" and "sudo virt-manager"?

Hi all, What is the difference between starting virt-manager by "virt-manager" and by "sudo virt-manager"? It seems that there are two copy of virt-manager running in the background. When I run *"virt-manager",* I got a error of "*Unable to open a connection to the libvirt management daemon. **Libvirt URI is: qemu:///system **Verify that: - The 'libvirtd' daemon has been started*". Whereas when I run *"sudo virt-manager",* I got a error of *"Error starting Virtual Machine Manager: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See **http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/**for information."* ** How should I deal with the two issues respectively? Is there any drawback by simply running "virt-manager"?

Regards, Allen 2014-10-27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Allen Qiu _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users