From: "Matthew Schumacher" <matt.s@aptalaska.com>
To: "Laine Stump" <laine@laine.org>, libvirt-users@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:53:34 AM
Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] QemuDomainObjEndJob called when libvirtd is started and libvirt insists qemu is using the wrong disk source.
On 04/20/2015 05:42 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Well, this is when the qemu process is killed (I'm pretty clever, eh? :-)
>
> I have 3 questions:
>
> 1) what version of libvirt are you running and on what distro?
>
> 2) can you reproduce this reliably?
>
> 3) If the answer to 2 is "yes", do you have the libvirt-debuginfo
> package installed, and can you stop libvirtd, then run it under gdb with
> a breakpoint at qemuProcessKill? Once you hit that breakpoint, you could
> get a backtrace with the "bt" command and that might give us some useful
> info about where it is coming from.
>
> Oh, by the way, are these perhaps transient domains started with
> virDomainCreate*? Or are they standard persistent domains defined with
> virDomainDefineXML?
>
> (Also, I'll just mention that qemuProcessKill() is called from
> qemuProcessStop(), and I notice that is called in a couple places
> related to snapshot create and revert which you mentioned in the
> original message. Since this isn't normal behavior, and the snapshot
> stuff is under active development, I wonder if this is related...)
Laine,
First, thanks for your help, I appreciate it. Your questions:
1. # libvirtd -V
libvirtd (libvirt) 1.2.14
2. I can reproduce this every time.
3. I compile it myself, so I'll work on getting a libvirt-debug build
going.
So this is compiled on Slackware64-14.1 as I prefer a more bsd linux and
like the simplicity of a traditional init, as well as the ability to
cook this down into a very simple usb based distro not unlike slax.
Earlier I posted a bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210903) and got a reply
fro Shanzhi that said that he was unable to reproduce using
libvirt-1.2.14-1.el7.x86_64 and qemu-kvm-rhev-2.2.0-8.el7.x86_64, but I
don't see his comment on the ticket anymore, so I wonder if he was able
to reproduce and removed his comment or perhaps his comment got
removed. If it does indeed work on the Redhat packages then that seems
to indicate that there is something that doesn't work when libvirt is
built on non-redhat systems which may be related.
I can reply this question, :)
I didn't delete the comment, and you're unable delete your comment in bugzilla.
I just set it to Private as I mention some downstream info, so,.. I do can't reproduce it even
with libvirt build from latest libvirt.git on my Fedora21.
For your second problem in that bug, you can refer to bug 1197592
Let me do some more digging and I'll back back to you tomorrow.
Thanks!
schu
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
--
Regards
shyu