Re: [libvirt-users] Should domain be undefined after migration, or not?
On 20/01/2014 17:44, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For historical reasons the default is to leave the config file
present on the source machine. You can control this behaviour
though when triggering migration. There are an insane number
of possible scenarios...
http://libvirt.org/migration.html#config
Many thanks. It looks like
--undefine-source --persist is what I was
looking for. I'll need to dig a little deeper to see how virt-manager
behaves.
I think the explanation for the behaviour I observed is when the VM was
migrated from A -> B -> C, and I was watching the B -> C migration. It
was persistent on A but transient on B.
Thanks again,
Brian.