On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:08:58AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/07/2013 09:04 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote:
Eric,
[please don't top-post on technical lists]
Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple. http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html
Isn't the existing virtlockd support already sufficient for this? If not, what is preventing the virtlock framework from interacting with rbd disks?
Nothing really. The current impl only deals with disks with type=file or type=block, ignoring type=network. We could extend it to cope with the latter though - either using a URI to uniquely identify the network storage, or better yet using some unique volume ID if available. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|